Strengths: * Established market position in the housing finance space The assets under management (AUM) for PNB Housing had grown at a CAGR of around 45% from fiscal 2016 to fiscal 2019 (36% year on year) reaching Rs 84,722 crore as on March 31, 2019. For nine months ended fiscal 2020, advances growth slowed down to an annualized growth of 2.5% reaching Rs 86,297 crore. In line with the cautious stance adopted by the company, the wholesale segment has degrown in the first nine months of fiscal 2020, consequently, leading to an increase in the share of retail portfolio. Consequently, share of individual housing loans to the AUM has moved to 59% as on December 31, 2019 while share of the wholesale portfolio reduced to 18%. As on December 31, 2019, the AUM comprised of retail housing loans (59%), retail loan against property (LAP; 19%), retail non-residential property loan (NRPL; 4%), construction finance (12%), corporate term loan (CTL; 4%) and lease rental discounting (LRD; 2%). In terms of geography, it is well diversified across India; with western, northern and southern India contributing 41%, 30% and 29%, respectively, as on December 31, 2019. However, amidst the current environment, with caution around the wholesale portfolio, the company intends to reduce the share of the same going forward and is taking steps towards this direction with a stated objective to only grow in the retail segment. * Well-diversified resource profile PNB Housing has maintained a healthy resource profile with better-than-peer cost of borrowings supported by its long-standing relationships with banks, insurance companies, provident funds, corporates and pension funds, multilateral agencies (IFC and ADB) and mutual funds. The company has a diversified funding profile, with an adequate mix of retail and wholesale borrowings. A significant proportion of its funding is long-term to match the long tenure of its loan portfolio. The company has increased its focus on raising fixed deposits after December 2011; the share of fixed deposits in total borrowings stood at around 23% as on December 31, 2019. While the share of fixed deposits had earlier reduced from 27% as on March 31, 2016, this was due to a conscious decision by the company given the relatively higher cost of deposits. With the funding environment remaining challenging, PNB Housing now intends to focus on resource diversification and tapping the fixed deposits option. On a steady state basis, the share of granular fixed deposits to overall borrowings is expected to be around 23-25%. Adding to the diversity in its resource profile, company has adequate proportion of capital market funding, with bonds and non-convertible debentures comprising 22% of total resources as on December 31, 2019. Other funding sources include banks borrowings (23%), refinance from NHB (7%), commercial paper (3%), and external commercial borrowings (6%) and direct assignment (19%) and deposits (20%). Even amidst the current environment, with lenders exercising caution in increasing exposures, PNB Housing has managed to raise over Rs 33,000 crores since April 2019 till December 31, 2019. More pertinently, they have raised through diversified routes including bank loans, non-convertible debenture, refinance from NHB, external commercial borrowings and retail fixed deposits. Borrowing costs have risen only marginally for PNB Housing as compared to other non-banks. Nevertheless, the increase has been moderate with the company's borrowing cost (based on yearly average) reaching around 8.3-8.4% for nine months ended fiscal 2020 compared to 8.2% for the fiscal 2019. * Brand-sharing benefits from the parentage of PNB PNB Housing continues to benefit from branding support from its parent, PNB (32.65% ownership currently). While the latter's stake has reduced from 51% following the IPO and the stake sale in November 2017, CRISIL believes PNB will remain amongst the largest shareholders of PNB Housing in the near term. CRISIL has noted that Punjab National Bank (PNB), the single largest shareholder with 32.65% stake, intends to hold a minimum of 26% stake in PNB Housing; but, they are not likely to immediately take part in the current equity raise. CRISIL believes that PNB's continued association as promoter along with sharing of brand name benefits PNB Housing in a confidence-sensitive environment for NBFCs and HFCs. PNB Housing is being managed by an independent management team, comprising professionals with strong domain knowledge and extensive experience in the mortgage business. Weaknesses: * Moderate capitalisation PNB Housing last raised equity capital of around Rs 3000 crores in fiscal 2017 during the initial public offering (IPO), post which the on-book gearing improved to 6.4 times as on March 31, 2017 from 12.4 times as of March 31, 2016 (CRISIL-adjusted gearing including off book improved to 6.9 times as on March 31, 2017 from 12.4 times as on March 31, 2016. Off book assets entirely comprises of securitised portfolio sold via direct assignment route without any partial credit guarantee). Since then company's on-book gearing has moved to 8.4 times as on December 31, 2019 (adjusted gearing including off book of 10.4 times). The company had earlier planned to raise around Rs 2000 crore of equity by March 2020. However, the equity raise is now expected to be lower at Rs 1500 to 1600 crore. CRISIL has noted that Punjab National Bank (PNB), the single largest shareholder with 32.65% stake, intends to hold a minimum of 26% stake in PNB Housing; but, they are not likely to immediately take part in the current equity raise. CRISIL believes that PNB's continued association as promoter along with sharing of brand name benefits PNB Housing in a confidence-sensitive environment for NBFCs and HFCs. However, their inability to participate in the equity raise will constrain quantum of funds raised and in turn growth rates as the company intends to focus on keeping leverage under control. Consequently, the on-book gearing is expected to be around 6.5 times while the CRISIL-adjusted gearing including off book will range between 7.5 to 8 times. Further, the capital adequacy metrics have improved with Tier 1 and overall capital adequacy ratio at around 14.09% and 17.06% respectively as on December 31, 2019 compared to 11.00% and 13.98% as on March 31, 2019. The networth coverage for net non-performing assets remains adequate at 10 times as on December 31, 2019. Further, CRISIL notes that the management now intends to recalibrate their growth strategy keeping in mind the capital availability and also increase the share of retail book due to challenges in the wholesale book. This will ensure that, post equity raise, the leverage metrics and capital adequacy levels remain under control. * Susceptibility to asset quality risks arising from the wholesale book Company's gross non-performing assets (GNPA) ratio deteriorated to 1.75% as on December 31, 2019 compared to 0.48% as on March 31, 2019. The increase in GNPA was mainly on account of slippages from some large developer accounts. The construction finance/corporate term loans segment for PNB Housing have grown fast in the past. As on December 31, 2019, GNPAs for the wholesale loan portfolio stood at 4.17% compared to 0.17% as on March 31, 2019. While there are some accounts, which are currently stressed, the management is taking steps in order to ensure no further slippages take place from these accounts. A significant proportion of wholesale book is currently under moratorium with staggered repayments. As on December 31, 2019, around 65% of the wholesale loan portfolio is still in moratorium period. However, by March 31, 2021 additional around 40% of the book will come out of moratorium. While the company follows sound credit appraisal and risk management practices, has adequate collateral cover for its wholesale loans, and has also built strong recovery capabilities, asset quality in the past for the wholesale portfolio was also supported by an active refinance market, particularly for the real estate loans. However, with the slowdown in the real estate sector and incipient stress for developers, ability to get timely refinance/exits and recovery from some of these exposures and maintain asset quality metrics is a key monitorable. * Average profitability
PNB Housing has average earnings profile. The return on total managed assets (RoMA; PAT by Total Assets + Securitisation) stood at 1.23% (annualized) for the first nine months ended December 31, 2019 (1.46% for fiscal 2019 same as last year). NIMs have compressed over the years mainly on account intensifying competition from banks and higher cost of borrowing. For nine months ended fiscal 2020, Net interest margins (NIMs; total income - interest expense by yearly average of total managed assets including off book) stood at 2.67% compared to 2.86% for fiscal 2019. NIMs are expected to be maintained at similar levels as the company increases their exposure towards the self-employed segment which would provide higher yields. However, improvement in NIMs going forward would hinge upon the company's ability to lower its cost of funds as it reduces the share of wholesale portfolio leading to a higher share of the low yielding retail asset classes.
Over the past five fiscals, operating costs for PNB Housing have remained high owing to investments in infrastructure, systems and processes and people to support its strong growth plans, and increase in provisions (mainly for standard assets) and maintenance of excess liquidity to overcome with current challenging volatile market. With the new branches and investments in technology achieving scale, the same is expected to improve its operating costs which would support the earnings profile.
Credit costs have inched up to around 0.69% in the first nine months of fiscal 2020 compared to 0.23% for fiscal 2019. The increase in credit cost can be attributed to additional provisions made on potential stressed accounts. Also, with the benefit of reduction in corporate tax, additional provision was made as steady state in the first half of fiscal 2020. Nevertheless the consistency in credit costs remains a key monitorable. Hence, the ability of the company to manage asset quality going ahead specifically in the wholesale segment, will be a key determinant of profitability going ahead.
|